Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Jannik Sinner vs Brandon Nakashima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Sinner vs Nakashima analysis and find out who is favored!
Jannik Sinner vs Brandon Nakashima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Sinner 1 - 0 Nakashima
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Sinner has won 58.64% of points on their second serve, while Nakashima has won 56.19%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Sinner, in recent form, has won 54.97% of their opponent's second serve points, while Nakashima has won 47.84%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.73% and 30.2% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Sinner has saved 79.7% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nakashima has saved 67.98% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Sinner has won 88% of matches played (W/L 66/ 9), with Nakashima winning 60.98% (W/L 50/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Sinner has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 79% (W/L 88/ 24), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 58% (W/L 14/ 10). Nakashima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 54/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 29/ 27).
- Player level: In the last year, Sinner has played most of their matches on the Masters series, winning 85.19% of matches (W/L 23/ 4), where as Nakashima has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 75.61% of matches (W/L 31/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Sinner winning 1 times and Nakashima being victorious 0 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Sinner winning 3 and Nakashima winning 1. The last match between Sinner and Nakashima was at the U.S. Open - New York, 03-09-2022, Third, Hard with Jannik Sinner getting the victory 3-6 6-4 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:59:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Sinner and Nakashima have played a deciding set 0 times, with Sinner winning 0 times and Nakashima 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Sinner winning 0, and Nakashima 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Sinner has played against opponents with an average rank of 83.43 while Nakashima has played against players with an average rank of 235.4.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Sinner has won 81% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nakashima has won 43% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Sinner has converted 44.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nakashima has converted 33.44% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
2
Rank
2
High
22
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
84
Rank
43
High
22
Age
R
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
72% (302-119)
Career Total W/L
61% (193-121)
94% (31-2)
YTD W/L
70% (35-15)
$15,019,015
Career Prize Money
$1,758,985
3
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Jannik Sinner | Brandon Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 3 | 1 |
| Games Won | 21 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 16 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:59:0 | 2:59:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (70/116) | 58% (69/118) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 74% (52/70) | 62% (43/69) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 50% (23/46) | 45% (22/49) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 32% (6/19) | 25% (2/8) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (53/118) | 35% (41/116) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-4 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Jannik Sinner
Player
Brandon Nakashima
60%
(
70 of
116)
1st Serve %
58%
(
69 of
118)
16
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
50%
(
23 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
32%
(
6 of
19)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
41 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
53 of
118)
128
Total Points Won
106
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Jannik Sinner | Brandon Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 94% (31/2) | 70% (35/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 87% (73/11) | 65% (75/41) |
| Games Win/Loss | 63% (491/292) | 54% (637/545) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 94% (17/1) | 73% (11/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 90% (9/1) | 65% (13/7) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (5/0) | 73% (11/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.45 | 0.66 |
| Aces Total | 172 | 379 |
| DFs per game | 0.14 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 54 | 74 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:3 | 1:53:27 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 98.58 | 274.3 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (1441/2309) | 65% (2409/3733) |
| 1st Serve W% | 79% (1144/1441) | 75% (1802/2409) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 59% (509/868) | 56% (744/1324) |
| BPs Won% Total | 45% (120/267) | 33% (108/323) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (1047/2515) | 37% (1432/3891) |
| Slam W/L | 100% (10/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Masters W/L | 89% (16/2) | 64% (7/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 100% (5/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 77% (23/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 91% (20/22) | 70% (33/47) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (10/10) | 50% (1/2) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 62% (18/29) |
| Deciding Set W% | 71% (5/7) | 64% (9/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 97% (29/28) | 88% (33/29) |
| 1st set W, L | 3% (29/1) | 12% (33/4) |
| 1st set L, W | 75% (4/3) | 31% (16/5) |
Jannik Sinner Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R3 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Pavel Kotov
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
41 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
47 of
64)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
21 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
99)
98
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Richard Gasquet
76%
(
58 of
76)
1st Serve %
49%
(
45 of
92)
8
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
21 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
98
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Christopher Eubanks
61%
(
54 of
89)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
6
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
9
78%
(
42 of
54)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
93)
104
Total Points Won
78
|
6-3 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF | w/o | H2H | |||
| R4 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Karen Khachanov
69%
(
59 of
85)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
5
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
0
80%
(
47 of
59)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
39 of
58)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
24 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
84)
89
Total Points Won
80
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Pavel Kotov
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
18 of
34)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Lorenzo Sonego
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
56
Total Points Won
30
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stefanos Tsitsipas
Player
Jannik Sinner
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
102)
7
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
44 of
59)
62%
(
21 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
20 of
43)
20%
(
3 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
38 of
102)
94
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Holger Rune
59%
(
53 of
90)
1st Serve %
53%
(
50 of
95)
5
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
5
87%
(
46 of
53)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
41 of
50)
68%
(
25 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
19 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
82
|
6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jannik Sinner
Player
Jan-Lennard Struff
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
44%
(
28 of
63)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
4
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
16 of
35)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Hubert Hurkacz
Player
Brandon Nakashima
62%
(
81 of
130)
1st Serve %
64%
(
88 of
137)
16
Aces
16
2
Double Faults
2
83%
(
67 of
81)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
63 of
88)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
24 of
49)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
28%
(
37 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
50 of
137)
143
Total Points Won
124
|
6-7(2) 6-1 6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
67%
(
71 of
106)
1st Serve %
61%
(
78 of
127)
13
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
60 of
71)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
49 of
78)
69%
(
24 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
33%
(
5 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
21%
(
22 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
127)
136
Total Points Won
97
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Francesco Passaro
Player
Brandon Nakashima
58%
(
63 of
108)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
51 of
63)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
49 of
64)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
33 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
101)
109
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(2) 6-7(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mariano Navone
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
92)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
39 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Brandon Nakashima
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jesper De Jong
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
70%
(
30 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Nerman Fatic
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Francisco Comesana
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Sinner Vs Nakashima Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
